Bidv

Thursday, October 6, 2016

How Samsung Has Tried to Minimize Damage After the Galaxy Note 7 Recall


How Samsung Has Tried to Minimize Damage After the Galaxy Note 7 Recall

Continued reports of defects undermine Samsung

Heated meetings, sacrificed holidays, and teams monitoring social media round-the-clock to track whether there have been any new smartphone fires: Samsung Electronics is still desperately trying to limit the damage of a record global recall announced more than a month ago.

Samsung SSNLF 3.23% said most of the fire-prone Galaxy Note 7s have been recovered in major markets, including the United States and South Korea.

But the trouble is not over for either South Korea’s largest listed company or mobile division chief Koh Dong-jin, who bowed in a public apology last month, less than a year into the job.

Samsung’s hopes of finally getting ahead of the crisis took a knock on Wednesday. A replacement model began smoking inside a U.S. plane on Wednesday, the family that owns it said, prompting fresh investigations by safety regulators.

And on top of that, Samsung is being pressured by one of the world’s most aggressive hedge funds, Elliott Management, to split the company and pay out $27 billion in a special dividend.

Unlucky Turn


Ahead of the Note 7’s August launch, Koh told other executives how lucky he was: taking charge of the world’s largest smartphone business just before it began to reverse two years of declining sales and market share.

Instead, he was soon weathering international aviation bans on the phone, online jokes, and criticism over Samsung’s handling of the process. It initially wiped almost $16 billion off the company’s market value.

The crisis is worse than any other the company has faced, said one Samsung insider, who declined to be named due to the sensitivity of the subject. “It directly impacts our products, our brand, and trust with consumers,” this person said.

Samsung told Reuters in a statement it was not thinking about management or organizational changes, and is focused on the Note 7 replacement process.

Samsung insiders say that the unassuming Koh needs to get sales moving again so that the company can salvage the fourth quarter and defend market share against Apple AAPL 0.12% and other rivals.

Get Data Sheet, Fortune’s technology newsletter.

“If this doesn’t get fixed quickly, everybody loses,” said a second Samsung source, who didn’t want to be named due to the sensitivity of the issue, adding that as yet there was no finger-pointing at Koh or other executives.

TV ads for the Note 7 resumed in South Korea last week, with additional incentives for those buying the device in October.

“We will give Note 7 all the support we were going to give it in the first place,” David Lowes, Samsung’s chief marketing officer in Europe, told Reuters. “There is no backing away from it.”

Too Much, Too Soon?


Some of the toughest criticism leveled at Samsung has been over its fumbling of the recall.

It warned affected users to immediately turn off their phones only after the same warning was issued by the U.S. consumer protection agency. The regulator criticized Samsung for not following proper recall procedures.

Some consumers also complained about the replacement phones, either saying they lose power too quickly or run too hot.

In China, where Samsung says its Note 7 uses safe batteries, some users claimed their phones caught fire, while it was forced to delay resuming sales in South Korea due to a slow recall progress.

Eric Schiffer, brand strategy expert and chairman of Reputation Management Consultants based in Los Angeles, said Samsung needs to woo its customers.

“They need to be very transparent. Invite customers who have been affected to the plants…let go of whoever was in charge of this debacle, and accept responsibility and show goodwill by sending new phones, giving discounts – anything to show the importance of the customer relationship,” he said.

Samsung has formed a dedicated team of public relations staff to speed up decision making and contain damage, the sources inside the company said.

“We share information instantly and far more widely than usual. We try to reply more promptly,” said one of them, who noted how complex it was to deal with a recall across 10 nations spread across the globe.

Samsung employees say the recall has dominated internal meetings since the Sept. 2 announcement, whether it be efforts to get the recalled phones off the streets or deal with a continued stream of claims and reports of damages or problems.

Long hours, weekends and canceled tie off are commonplace. The long Korean thanksgiving holiday—the biggest holiday of the year—coincided with the U.S. consumer protection agency’s mid-September recall of 1 million Note 7 phones.

Sleepless Nights


Koh, 55, is a Samsung veteran with previous roles in human resources and research & development. His elevation had been a shot in the arm for the mobile business, company insiders said, as he boosted morale by delegating more responsibility to subordinates and stressing a bottom-up approach.

At a Galaxy S7 launch event in March, he confessed to sleepless nights agonizing over how to rejuvenate a business battling falling profits and market share losses to Apple and others.

With signs of a recovery—first-half mobile profits grew by nearly half—Koh had started to focus more on how to ensure steady long-term profit growth, according to a person familiar with his thinking.

That all changed with reports of battery fires weeks after the Note 7 launch.

Missed sales and recall expenses could cost Samsung nearly $5 billion this year, analysts say. The risk to its brand is as yet unquantifiable.

Samsung’s quarterly earnings forecast on Friday will provide an initial glimpse of the recall impact.

For more, read: Samsung Won’t Cave Easily to Its Activist Investor

It has been particularly painful because many insiders thought the Note 7 could be a landmark product. Pre-orders for the 988,900 won ($895) device were stronger than expected, and the recall cost Samsung a month-long sales window before Apple launched its new iPhone.

The latest twist created by activist fund Elliott may be unwelcome to Samsung’s founding Lee family, which still controls the company through a complex web of cross shareholdings.

However, for investors generally it has been a shot in the arm as Samsung shares have recovered to be well above the pre-recall levels and hit all-time highs on Thursday.






source: www.fortune.com

Monday, September 26, 2016

When Will The Galaxy Note 7 Go Back On Sale?


When Will The Galaxy Note 7 Go Back On Sale?

Although there were indications from the South Korean company that it would put its phablet back on sale this coming Wednesday in its home territory, that date has been pushed back by another week (reports Sammobile). The company believes that the return rate of existing smartphones will drop sharply if the handset is put back on sale alongside a marketing campaign to say that the handset is now safe.

The situation looks to be even bleaker in Europe. Chief Marketing Officer David Lowes has told the site that “we fully expect [the Galaxy Note 7] to be available everywhere by the end of November.” No specific date for the resumption of sales he’s been given beyond “before the end of the fourth quarter.” I suspect that as Samsung gains more control of the situation the old maxims of ‘under promise and over deliver’ are kicking in.

Samsung Galaxy Note 7 (Image: Samsung Press)
Samsung Galaxy Note 7 (Image: Samsung Press)

The question about the level of damage to Samsung is going to play out over the next few weeks and months. The critically acclaimed Galaxy Note 7 is arguably the best Android smartphone currently on the market, and was expected to be one of Samsung’s biggest selling handsets of the year. Before the voluntary recall was initiated, it was on course to reach 125 percent of the sales of last year’s Galaxy Note 5. Some analysts are now predicting sales to struggle to reach sixty percent of the total shipments of last year’s phablet.

As the Note 7 rolls out again, the new period of initial sales will provide the strongest indicator of the damage caused to Samsung’s Note brand. October will also see Samsung reveal its quarterly earnings for Q3 2016, which covers the reveal, launch, and recall of the phablet. The industry is expecting to see an eight percent fall in the South Korean’s operating profits.

Samsung Galaxy Note 7, front view
Samsung Galaxy Note 7 (Image: Samsung Press)






source: www.forbes.com

Monday, September 5, 2016

More Than 1.6M Galaxy Note 7s Could Have Bad, Explosion-Prone Battery


More Than 1.6M Galaxy Note 7s Could Have Bad, Explosion-Prone Battery

Galaxy Note 7s Could Have Bad, Explosion-Prone Battery
The latest Note 7 to explode, this time in Australia. credit: reddit user Crushader

The news just keeps getting worse for Samsung, and owners of its latest flagship, the Galaxy Note 7. You already know about the Note 7′s global recall due to some devices bursting into flames, but the number of potentially affected devices, which Samsung have claimed was less than 0.01%, may actually be a bit higher.

Try 64.99% higher (or more).

Both the Wall Street Journal and Korea Hearald reported today that Samsung have dropped its in-house battery-maker, Samsung SDI , completely from future Note 7s productions, going instead with Chinese company ATL, which had already provided the battery for some Note 7s (most notably the China and Hong Kong variants, which explains why Samsung Hong Kong is continuing to sell the Note 7). The reason for the decision is, of course, that Samsung SDI was responsible for the faulty batteries that led to the explosive devices.

Now figures differ between both reports, but the WSJ is reporting that Samsung SDI provided the batteries to 65% of the 2.5 million Note 7 units already sold, while Korea Herald said the the number is closer to 70%. Even if we go with the lower figure, 65% of 2.5 million is still 1,625,000.

Throughout the weekend, most Note 7 owners on internet forums (such as XDA, Reddit, The Verge and Android Authority), at least from what I’ve seen, were pretty openly “meh” about the potential danger of a faulty Note 7. Many users said 35 cases (at the time) out of 2.5 million is far too tiny a number to stress about, and quite a few actually said they’re considering ignoring the exchange process altogether (the reason? “I don’t like setting up my phone again”).

But since then, two more explosions have occurred, in Australia and Taiwan, with the latter phone supposedly combusting when it wasn’t even charging. That plus the new reports that Samsung SDI provided batteries for 0ver 65% of the phones out there? Yikes.


We probably should have seen this coming. Samsung wouldn’t have announced a global recall, of every phone in the world (except China and Hong Kong, apparently), which will cost the company a reported $1 billion, if the number of affected phones were indeed just 0.01%. The reality is, potentially 1.6 million phones could have faulty batteries.

So, Note 7 owners, please, be careful with it when charging, and don’t be foolish enough to skip the global recall program.

To paraphrase Ben Affleck in a really bad movie this year, “if there’s even a 1% chance of [the Note 7] being a threat, we have to treat it as an absolute certainty.”

source: www.forbes.com

Friday, July 29, 2016

WhatsApp messages aren’t actually deleted


Research shows deleted WhatsApp messages aren’t actually deleted

WhatsApp messages security

Chat logs from WhatsApp linger on your phone even after you’ve deleted them, according to new research published by iOS expert Jonathan Zdziarski.

Forensic traces of chats linger on the phone even after a user archives or deletes them, Zdziarski found, and could be accessed by someone with physical access to the device or by law enforcement issuing a warrant to Apple for iCloud backups. Although the data is deleted from the app, it is not overwritten in the SQLite library and therefore remains on the phone.

Monday, July 25, 2016

Galaxy Note 7 Sporting 12MP Main Camera


Import Site Shows Galaxy Note 7 Sporting 12MP Main Camera

Samsung Phone Note 7

Samsung introduced the first Galaxy Note in late 2011. The original device was specified somewhat similarly to a souped up Galaxy S II, which was Samsung’s flagship device at the time. The Note came with a higher performance Exynos processor, a 5.4-inch AMOLED panel, a 2,500 mAh rechargeable battery and revised software that benefited from Samsung’s take on a stylus, the S Pen. Every year since then, Samsung has released a new Galaxy S flagship in the first half (varying from the first to the second quarter) and in the second half of the year, a Galaxy Note flagship. For 2016, Samsung released the Galaxy S7 and S7 edge in the first half of the year and is planning on releasing the Samsung Galaxy Note 7 in the second half of the year – likely in the first half of August. Samsung have decided to skip a number in the Note line up as the last model was the Note 5, presumably in order to bring the model number into alignment.

The Galaxy Note 7 is believed to be based around a 5.7-inch, QHD (1440p, or 2,560 by 1,440 pixel) resolution Samsung Super AMOLED panel, have 4 GB of RAM to accompany either the Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 of the Samsung Exynos 8893 System-on-Chip, depending on the market. The device will come with a fingerprint sensor and an iris sensor, bringing with it the most comprehensive biometric security systems available for a consumer smartphone. There will be a 3,500 mAh rechargeable battery complete with fast charging functionality and the model will come with an IP68 water and dust rating, meaning it can be submerged in up to five feet of freshwater for half an hour. These rumours for the device specification also include that the Note 7 will include a similar main rear camera as Samsung have used on the S7 models: a 12MP, optically stabilised unit. And now we’ve seen a report from Indian shipping and import / export tracking website, Zauba, showing the specification including that 12MP rear camera.

It does need highlighting that the Zauba site is not infallible; although the majority of specifications showing on the site match other rumours, including the inclusion of a 6.0-inch model, but for the most part the website is confirming details we’ve already seen. We are expecting Samsung’s latest flagship device, running Android 6.0.1 Marshmallow under the new Grace UX interface, to be officially announced on August 2nd at Samsung’s Unpacked event.





source: www.androidheadlines.com

Sunday, July 17, 2016

Why Are "Pokemon Go" Servers Down?


Why Are "Pokemon Go" Servers Down? Here Is The Likely Reason The Game Isn't Working

What's that? You canceled all of your weekend plans today to spend some quality time hunting for Pidgeys, and now you can't get the game to work? You, like thousands of fans everywhere, were probably throwing your phone across the room in frustration earlier today, wondering why "Pokemon Go" servers aren't working. There's a reason the popular Niantic Inc. augmented reality game has been freezing, but the issue appears to have resolved itself at least for now.

If you've been playing the game since its July 6 release, you're likely familiar with the frustration of realizing the "Pokemon Go" servers are down. Since its launch, the game has racked up an enormous following as everyone immediately clamored to relive their childhood dreams of becoming Pokemon Trainers IRL. However, the servers weren't immediately prepared to deal with how many people were trying to access the game. As Bustle writer Elizabeth Ballou reported the weekend of the game's release, the servers were more likely to be down during peak rush hour playtimes (like in the mornings, or during lunch) when more people were playing.

Of course, it wasn't long before server resources popped up all over the internet. It only takes a quick search to find apps that notify players about the servers' status, websites that tell users when the game isn't working, and even Twitter accounts that alert fans to server updates.

So why does the server seem particularly faulty today? Most likely, it's because "Pokemon Go" officially launched this weekend in the U.K., and is rolling out to 26 other countries in Europe, expanding the user base even further. Here's what "Pokemon Go" posted earlier today on its Facebook page:



With so many additional people flooding the server, it's bound to become a little glitchy:




Take a deep breath, everyone. "Pokemon Go" is at peace... at least, for now.




source: www.bustle.com

Tuesday, July 12, 2016

Samsung introduces 4TB SSD


Samsung introduces 4TB SSD for a cool $1,500

4TB Solid State Drive
Samsung Solid State Drive

Traditional spinning hard drives have typically enjoyed two advantages over their solid-state brethren. They’re vastly cheaper in terms of their cost-per-GB, and they could hold far more information in a single enclosure. Both of these advantages have been steadily eroded over the past few years as SSD costs have fallen and capacities have increased, but hard drives have still eked out a win in both categories (at least at price points that consumers are going to pay).

Bit by bit, however, SSDs have closed the gap. Samsung’s new 4TB SSD is a $1,500 solid state drive that aims to replace your HDD altogether, provided you’ve got four figures to drop on a storage medium in the first place. Samsung’s TLC-based 850 EVO combines a 40nm process node with 48-layer vertical NAND (aka 3D NAND). Anandtech had a chance to put the drive through a battery of tests and reports that it performs well, even if it doesn’t break any particular new ground beyond price.


With SSD prices continuing to fall year-on-year thanks to 3D stacked NAND, why bother buying a hard drive at all? In a word: Price. 4TB HDDs currently sell for as little as $100, which puts them in the 2.5 cents per GB market. A 4TB SSD comes out at $1,500 — 15x as much money, and a cost-per-GB ratio of 37.5 cents per GB. That’s not bad at all for SSDs, which were $1 per GB not so long ago, but it’s still a vast gulf to cross as far as high-capacity drives are concerned. Keep in mind, these are retail prices; manufacturers negotiating with Western Digital or Seagate can undoubtedly get much better deals on a cost-per-GB basis.

SSDs have gradually become more common in lower-end systems, but not as quickly as one might expect. Apple may have moved to an all-SSD distribution, but most companies haven’t followed suit yet — plenty of systems are still either based on HDDs or use cache drives to improve performance without adding much to overall costs. Long term, we still expect SSDs to replace spinning disks for most tasks, but the hard drive still has some life in yet. Meanwhile, if you’re lucky enough to have the money to drop on an SSD and need 4TB worth of storage, the 850 EVO looks like a great option.

Incidentally, it looks like 3-6TB drives are all in the sweet spot between 2 cents and 2.5 cents per GB if you’re willing to buy white-label (off-brand) drives. These are drives created for the OEM market that aren’t branded by the manufacturer but are sold to OEMs like Dell, HP, and other builders. Name-brand drives cost significantly more than the white label drives Newegg currently stocks, but it’s not clear if there’s any performance or reliability differences between these products and other hardware (other than potentially different warranty terms).




source: www.extremetech.com